About Lexicon

A feature rich and highly configurable, professional Joomla theme.

Thursday, 25 May 2023 16:00

Pressure Cooker Explosion Lawsuit: Key Elements and Considerations

severe burns severe burns

Pressure cookers have gained a lot of popularity among kitchen appliances due to their ability to cook food quickly and efficiently. However, there have been instances where pressure cookers have exploded, causing severe injuries and property damage.


According to ConsumerNotice.org, pressure cooker lawsuits argue that despite the intended purpose of safety features to prevent pressure cookers from posing risks in homes, defective product designs and inadequate safety features have resulted in explosions, thereby creating a misleading sense of security. Various brands, including popular electric pressure cooker brands like Crock Pot, Instant Pot, Breville, and Tristar Power Pressure Cooker XL, have been implicated in these lawsuits.

In this article, we will delve into the key elements and considerations involved in pressure cooker explosion lawsuits, shedding light on the legal aspects, potential claims, and factors that can influence the outcome.

Product Liability in the Case of a Pressure Cooker Explosion

Product liability refers to the legal responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, and sellers for injuries or damages caused by their products. In the context of a pressure cooker explosion lawsuit, product liability plays a crucial role.

It involves establishing that the pressure cooker was defective in its design, manufacturing, or warning labels, making it unreasonably dangerous for consumers.

Like, for instance, according to a report on AboutLawsuits.com, a woman who sustained severe burns due to an explosion from a Ninja pressure cooker has initiated a product liability lawsuit.

The lawsuit alleges that the device was sold with a defective and unreasonably dangerous design, as the advertised safety features failed to prevent the cooker's lid from opening while it still contained pressurized contents. The plaintiff, Prater, states that she was using her Ninja pressure cooker and had activated the pressure release mechanism to add an ingredient.

However, while the pressure was being released, the lid unexpectedly opened, resulting in a forceful eruption of hot liquid from the device and causing her to suffer severe burns.

According to the lawsuit, the safety features incorporated into the Ninja pressure cooker should have prevented the lid from opening until the pressure inside was fully released.

Manufacturer Negligence In a Pressure Cooker Explosion Lawsuit

Manufacturer negligence is a significant factor in pressure cooker explosion lawsuits. It involves proving that the manufacturer failed to exercise reasonable care in the design, production, or distribution of the pressure cooker.

According to TorHoerman Law, the primary flaw found in pressure cookers is the inadequate design for the safe release of built-up steam pressure. When the high pressure inside a pressure cooker is not effectively released, opening the device can result in an explosion.

To establish manufacturer negligence, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the negligence directly contributed to the pressure cooker's defects or malfunctions, resulting in the explosion and subsequent harm.

Consumer Allegations in Pressure Cooker Explosion Lawsuits

Consumer allegations in a pressure cooker explosion lawsuit refer to the specific claims made by the plaintiffs against the manufacturer or other parties involved. These allegations outline the legal arguments and grievances brought forth by the injured consumers.

ClassAction.org reports that a lawsuit against pressure cooker manufacturing brand Instant Pot alleges that despite the marketing claims of the products being safe and compliant with industry safety standards, the pressure cookers were not sufficiently tested to ensure their adherence to those standards.

According to the case, the Underwriters Laboratories 136 Standard for Safety mandates that pressure cookers should be manufactured in a manner that prevents the lid from being opened when there is pressure inside, even when a force of 100 pounds or less is applied gradually.

The lawsuit further asserts that Instant Brands failed to conduct thorough quality assurance inspections and testing on its Instant Pot products before accepting delivery from its Chinese manufacturer, specifically referring to pressure cookers intended for sale in the United States.

Investigation and Evidence in a Pressure Cooker Explosion Lawsuit

In pressure cooker explosion lawsuits, investigation and gathering evidence are crucial aspects of building a strong case. This involves conducting a thorough investigation to determine the cause of the explosion, collecting relevant documents, such as product manuals or safety records, and gathering witness testimonies.

Physical evidence, such as the pressure cooker itself, may be examined by experts to identify any defects or malfunctions. Additionally, medical records and expert opinions may be utilized to establish the link between the explosion and the plaintiff's injuries.

Damages and Injuries From a Pressure Cooker Explosion

Damages and injuries are significant elements in pressure cooker explosion lawsuits. Damages refer to the losses suffered by the plaintiffs as a result of the explosion, including medical expenses, pain and suffering, lost wages, property damage, and other economic and non-economic losses.

Injuries encompass the physical harm sustained by individuals, such as burns, scalds, lacerations, or other trauma caused by the pressure cooker explosion. The extent and severity of the damages and injuries play a vital role in determining the compensation sought by the plaintiffs and the overall outcome of the lawsuit.

Settlements and Verdicts of a Pressure Cooker Explosion Lawsuit

A settlement occurs when the parties involved reach an agreement outside of court, typically involving the payment of compensation by the defendant to the plaintiff. Settlements can provide quicker resolution and avoid the uncertainties of a trial.

Verdicts, on the other hand, are outcomes determined by a judge or jury after a trial. Verdicts can result in the defendant being found liable or not liable and can award compensation to the plaintiff.

Both settlements and verdicts impact the resolution of pressure cooker explosion lawsuits, determining the compensation received by the plaintiffs and establishing accountability for the defendant.


Pressure cooker explosion lawsuits encompass various key elements and considerations. Understanding the anatomy of these lawsuits is essential for both plaintiffs and defendants involved in seeking justice and resolution.

Through delving into these aspects, individuals gain insight into the complexities surrounding pressure cooker explosion lawsuits and the necessary considerations for pursuing compensation, holding manufacturers accountable, and ensuring the protection of consumer rights.